James Gangl's Comedic Argument
Nov
20 & 27. $10. 8pm. Bad Dog Theatre, 138 Danforth. 416-491-3115. www.baddogtheatre.com.
There are probably very few people who share an enthusiasm
for improv and the rigours of parliamentary debate. James Gangl is apparently
one of them and — disclosure! — I might as well hold up my hand too. Chalk it
up to too many years on, and being way too into, my high school debating team
that I still feel a certain shudder of procedural thrill whenever someone cites
Robert's Rules of Order.
Not that there was much of that at the opening of James
Gangl's Comedic Argument, though someone did, amazingly, call a point of order
amid the hubbub as the divorce lawyer team was polishing off the "circle
researchers."
Gangl (Dreadwood), who moderates the whole affair, has
lifted the idea with all due credit from Neil Muscott’s Comedy Debate, which ran some years ago at the old
Tim Sims Playhouse. Each round sees two teams of two improvisers each face off
on some issue shouted out by the audience. You know, real,
ripped-from-the-headlines stuff like public stoning or the search for alien
life.
That last one worked out especially well, with the reliable Alana
Johnston and Sean Tabares as a pair of befuddled Poindexters up
against the aforementioned, slicker-than-spit barristers. Tom McKay's character
was not far removed from the drawling patriarch he played in Hot Oil Barons in
Love, while Jerry Schaefer all but oozed across the Bad Dog stage, enjoyably
unctuous as one of those hog-jowled speechmakers who show up in so many Deep
South courtroom dramas.
Though evenly matched as performers, the lawyers made short
work of the circle researchers (Shades of Tim Sims again, by way of Rory Tate!)
— patching together an argument that ETs would be good for tourism. (It's curious how the leaps of logic heard from improv
debaters aren't that different from those of high-school teams. Or from those
heard on CPAC, for that matter.)
McKay and Schaefer were a hoot, well matched with the show's
faux formality, though Ken Hall and Isaac Kessler did well as — brace yourself
for an obscure reference — the midget/giant duo from Mad Max Beyond
Thunderdome. Hall, perched atop Kessler's shoulders for the entire round,
didn't have much to say except that movie's "Two men enter, one man
leaves" line, and Kessler was limited by his role to just caveman-ish
hoots and grunts, yet they still managed to out-funny their opponents.
It would be interesting to see the show tweaked so that the
personae of the teams also came from audience suggestions. Gangl has put
together an ace lineup of performers, which bodes well for the remaining shows.
But if Friday's debut of the Comedic Argument had a weak spot, it was that
some of the teams seemed to arrive too familiar with their characters — with
things a little too mapped out.
And yet, going in that direction on Friday night
would have robbed us all of Lisa Merchant and Alex Hatz as the Ethnic
Eccentrics — recurring and seemingly all-purpose characters who should be
brought out much more often.