RSS
Articles
Locations
Events
Movies
Photos
HOME
CITY
FOOD
STYLE
FILM
MUSIC
CLUBS
ARTS
FUN
CLASSIFIEDS
Neighbourhoods
Mobile
Toronto Notes
Why 311 is needed
by: Jonathan Goldsbie
June 17, 2008 4:06 PM
Comments: (0)
While the
Hobbesian
hyperbole is a bit off-putting, the general principle is true: it's easier to relate to the better nature of an individual than it is to attempt to coax some intelligence or logic from a population at large. Institutions are the same way: the individuals who work within them are more often than not competent, courteous and helpful; it's the larger system, the bureaucracy, that is ineffective, unfriendly and nearly impenetrable.
One of the most effective ways to get the information you need from the City of Toronto (provided
it's not already online
) or to report a problem that needs attention is to contact the individual whose job it is to tackle it. That probably should go without saying, but what most people don't realize is that you don't need to call a main number (e.g.
Access Toronto
) and be bounced around from one person to another, when you can just as effectively zero in on that person yourself.
A good way to do this is to capitalize on the research undertaken and the frustration already suffered by the
Star
's Jack Lakey, aka
The Fixer
. His columns usually conclude with the name, title and contact information of the person responsible for seeing that a particular problem gets corrected. Do a
Google site search of thestar.com
for "fixer" and then whatever words describe your issue. There's a decent chance he'll have tackled a similar problem in the last few years, and you shouldn't hesitate to get in touch with the same person he did.
The City of Toronto also has PDFs called "Whose Job Is It?" (one for your
community
and one for your
home
), which give you the phone numbers to call if one thing or another is broken. These are general customer service numbers, and if your problem is sufficiently run-of-the-mill that it's illustrated in one of the guides, then the people at the other end of the phone line are probably equipped to register your complaint. If, however, your issue goes beyond what's shown, Google the phone number to find out what city division it will connect you to, and then head over to the
complete phone directory
for that division. The directory will generally outline what each part of the division does, so just look for the person who heads up the branch that is most likely to have a handle on your issue.
You can also send them an email, which is better for passing on large amounts of information and/or photos. All staff have email addresses in the form of their first initial and then the first six or seven letters of their last name @toronto.ca. For example, the email address of Andy Koropeski, the Director of Transportation Services for the Toronto & East York District, is akoropes@toronto.ca. If you want to double-check that the email address you deduced is a valid one, just do a Google search. If you got it correct, it will probably net at least one hit. Emails, however, are easy for busy staff to ignore, as they go straight to their Blackberries and are promptly trashed or forgotten. So if you don't hear anything after a few days, follow up with a phone call.
If the issue you're working on is more related to a policy matter than a Fixer-type problem, the best way to find out who's handling the file is to do a
site search of toronto.ca
using key words in order to find reports written on that and similar subjects. All reports have the author's contact info at the bottom. If it's not a recent document, confirm that that staffer is still in the same job by checking the
alphabetical staff phone directory
to see if the number was current as of its most recent revision (February 2008).
Of course, you can always try Access Toronto and your
councillor
's office (although the former isn't set up to handle policy questions, other than those about basic things like garbage, water, pesticides, etc.) if you're having difficulty.
All of this, however, is intended to be streamlined by the city's new
311 information and complaint system
, which is supposed to launch next year but is one of those projects that —
Chinese Democracy
-style — was supposed to have launched pretty much every year for half a decade now. There is speculation that the repeated delays were orchestrated by councillors who are afraid they will no longer be necessary for the purpose of intermediating between constituents and staff. "Instead,"
wrote Adam Chaleff-Freudenthaler on Spacing
, "the dead weights on council might have to roll up their sleeves and dig into the real issues that face our city to demonstrate their utility to residents."
That sounds ideal, but the trouble is that those councillors are being
squeezed on the macro-management end
, too, with their ability to shape policy outside their own wards becoming increasingly limited. Pondering what upcoming governance changes might mean for the councillors who aren't on the mayor's team, Councillor Doug Holyday
asked
, "Are we just pothole fixers?"
It's a good question. But as nice as it is for a councillor to feel useful, every resident should — with or without a 311 system — invest a few minutes themselves to become their own pothole fixer.
TAGS:
City Hall
Toronto Notes
Toronto news and views, updated every day. torontonotes@eyeweekly.com.
Recent Posts
Required Reading: Feb. 9
February 09, 2010 12:00 AM
The T.O. Do List: Feb. 9
February 09, 2010 12:00 AM
Required Reading: Feb. 8
February 08, 2010 12:00 AM
The T.O. Do List: Feb. 8
February 08, 2010 12:00 AM
The T.O. Do List: Feb. 6 & 7
February 06, 2010 12:00 AM
Required Reading: Feb. 5
February 05, 2010 12:00 AM
Archives
2010 (67)
February (15)
January (52)
2009 (527)
December (53)
November (56)
October (56)
September (61)
August (60)
July (44)
June (40)
May (29)
April (31)
March (42)
February (31)
January (24)
2008 (178)
December (45)
November (26)
October (24)
September (15)
August (25)
July (17)
June (15)
May (11)
Category
Toronto Notes
(763)
Tags
Post Stats
147 Hits
Recent Comments
WindowpaneMG said
Esquire
on
Required Reading: Jan. 27
February 02, 2010 12:00 PM
Chum Girl said
Your print edition...
on
The sad decline of Citytv
January 29, 2010 3:00 PM
Kurwa said
cool place
on
The blitzkrieged Bop
December 11, 2009 11:28 AM
KingofthePaupers said
Lump on a log?
on
St. Paul debate stalled
September 13, 2009 5:35 PM
KingofthePaupers said
Issue is exclusion...
on
St. Paul debate stalled
September 13, 2009 5:35 PM
carrieivan said
It's about time!!!
on
So long Sneaky Dee's; enter The Garrison
September 12, 2009 3:00 PM
EYEWEEKLY.COM
Write a Letter to the Editor
Masthead and Contacts
Privacy Policy
Employment Opportunities
Advertise With Us
Distribution
Star Media Group Sites
canadianimmigrant.ca
insurancehotline.com
swaymag.ca
More Star Pass Sites
TheStar.com
HomeFinder.ca
toronto.com
Wheels.ca
Ourfaves.com
Copyright 1991 - 2009 EYE WEEKLY Newspapers Limited. All Rights Reserved. Distribution transmission,
Republication of any materials is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of EYE WEEKLY.
EYE WEEKLY is a division of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.