CBC Sparks transparency

Spark is presented as a CBC Radio show without a time slot, without time limitations, dealing in technology topics that are not entirely sensitive to time.

It’s tethered to a 27-minute time slot (Wednesday 11:30am and Saturday 4pm via 99.1 FM), which is also a succinctly satisfying length for a podcast, even if the torrent of Web 2.0 buzzwords explained by host Nora Young will likely sound like an antiquated novelty should anyone dust off the archives a few years from now.

Such is the risk when one actually puts these new tools into practice, rather than just blogging about how fantabulous they are and complaining that corporate channels are too stodgy to ever understand — the “They Don’t Get It” school of media criticism.

But who actually wants broadcasting designed by citizen committee? Despite thrumming along just fine since September, an episode earlier this month invited Spark listeners to collaborate on a script via public Wiki. The result sounded like more labour for the creators, and less creativity to savour — even though this is the kind of gimmick to get people chatting about how the CBC “gets it” after all.

“We wanted to try being transparent about the process,” says Young. “It’s not like we expected half the listeners would take the time to make changes. And, for a segment of the audience, it was a chance to learn how a show is put together.”

Mercifully, the process didn’t mirror the June 2005 effort by the Los Angeles Times to create a “Wikitorial” — shut down within three days when the vandals took over. (This was inevitably covered on Spark’s Wiki show.) Spark is too polite a program to generate such dissent: the show’s sharper edge is mostly achieved through audio collage, bridging segments and providing a coherent cohesion.

“What does Facebook sound like?” was a question Young was forced to ask herself last summer when conceiving a populist CBC show that harnessed social media trends du jour. “I find the rabbit holes of the online world fascinating. But it’s a constant battle against information overload. I’ve got Facebook fatigue now — at some point it becomes, 'No, I don’t want to download another zombie application.' All that minutiae isn’t worth my time. With access to so many arcane details, at what point do we lose our sense of coherence and perspective?”

Case in point, Young tells of being invited to a recent fondue party — clearly, leisure time activities for CBC Radio types haven’t changed since their studios were in Cabbagetown — where guests dressed in '70s cross-country skiwear, while the entire process from the invitation to the hangovers transpired online.

“For some people, it was as if the event didn’t conclude until the photos were shared,” she says. “The virtual documentation and actual experience were part of the same thing. That’s something I admit to not entirely understanding myself.”

Don’t snapshots of people you personally love or hate mugging for the camera prompt more morbid curiosity than a road map of the 1964 World’s Fair? “I’d rather look at the 1964 World’s Fair,” says Young. “But I’m drawn to stuff that serves a curatorial function. If there’s a weird thing that someone just found, it helps if you can see it as more than idiosyncratic, but part of something larger.”

Listening via podcast liberates Spark from certain limitations of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, though — the 2005 lockout stirred up plenty of the aforementioned “They Don’t Get It” rhetoric, and the desire to harness CBC Radio One’s ratings momentum into content that could be a bit less 20th century.

Young had eight years of hosting precious pop-cult Saturday standard Definitely Not the Opera behind her, and in subsequent freelance mode started The Sniffer in 2005 — twice-weekly bites of tech-happy chat with another CBC regular, Cathi Bond, that was part of a soon-aborted national podcast network designed to take advantage of the irrational exuberance surrounding the delivery medium. The Sniffer is still a going concern, though, and the effort helped legitimize Spark.

Plus, public radio came out the big winner in the podcasting sweepstakes, since nuanced non-commercial broadcasting proved ideal for time-shifted portable listening. The idea that advertisers would flock to homemade spoken word, not so much, even if the notion that most of the audience are coveting the spotlight for themselves has only bolstered the condescending stance of most big media.

“There’s still a problem of arrogance in large measure,” says Young. “The lines are blurring a bit more. Yet, I concur with what Andrew Keen writes about in The Cult of the Amateur — will there still be any budgets left for an investigative journalist to go somewhere? Or, is it just going to be a bunch of reporters chasing one other’s tail, writing about what the other ones wrote about Britney Spears.”

The ideal episode of Spark is likely the one debuting this week: a doctor gives two people a list of symptoms and they, along with listeners participating in the comments section, are challenged to diagnose themselves through online resources. Homespun radio fodder, with a subtext that geriatric CBC listeners can appreciate, that can be neatly packaged in a storytelling format. It’s not unlike a New York public radio project where listeners were asked to submit their corner store’s price of milk, beer and lettuce in order to determine who was being most gouged.

There’s lots of participatory process, but spare the expectation that anyone wants to do their own forensic accounting of whatever led to the final outcome. Young counters that there is an “appetite for transparency” out there among listeners.

Spark debuted concurrently with another CBC Radio One show, Search Engine, which applies a similar distribution model through a Thursday-morning timeslot, podcast and website. While that show sputtered out of the gate, as host Jesse Brown feigned sensationalism over topics like videogames in China, the program found its voice through old-school talk-radio conflict: railing against proposed copyright laws, baiting masked anti-Scientology protesters and, last week, a dialogue between notoriously anonymous CBC blogger “Ouimet” and the new CBC president and CEO, Hubert T. Lacroix.

Search Engine is more aggressively operating in a juvenile universe where your own privacy is always portrayed as under threat, yet no elected official — or overly opinionated online lout — is absolved from being hung out for public humiliation.

It’s made for an interesting dynamic: one show that’s part of the problem, and another that’s part of the solution, and the CBC can only benefit from trying both.

“Will it turn out, a few years from now that we’re coming off like dad trying to look cool at the kids’ party?” wonders Young. “That’s the fear. But it’s also the nature of doing something in the moment.”

 

scroll@eyeweekly.com

Marc Weisblott

Recent Posts
November 18, 2008  12:00 AM  
November 14, 2008  12:00 AM  
November 12, 2008  12:00 AM  
November 11, 2008  12:00 AM  
November 10, 2008  12:00 AM  
November 06, 2008  12:00 AM  
Archives
Category
Tags
Post Stats
31 Hits
Recent Comments
clitvin said so true
on An inconvenient Current
November 18, 2008  4:42 PM

lineup victim said AGO Queue Jumper
on AGO: not a shopping mall
November 18, 2008  3:45 PM

abc said u r right
on An inconvenient Current
November 17, 2008  4:42 PM

sodapop said heartsick
on An inconvenient Current
November 15, 2008  4:42 PM

valerieinto said I decided to look at...
on Girl Talk autopsy
November 12, 2008  3:51 PM

davidpylyp said Kingsway Theater
on Remaking the Kingsway
November 12, 2008  2:43 PM




Copyright 1991 - 2007 EYE WEEKLY Newspapers Limited. All Rights Reserved. Distribution transmission,
Republication of any materials is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of EYE WEEKLY.
EYE WEEKLY is a division of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited.
Register User