

<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>  <![CDATA[ CITY: CITY HALL BLOG]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.eyeweekly.com/cityhallblog]]></link>
        <language>en-us</language>

        
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Adam Vaughan vents]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[As I wrote in this week’s city feature, &quot;The Rising Right,&quot;
Councillor Adam Vaughan is no stranger to bringing forward controversial ideas that may not be
on the top of Mayor David Miller’s agenda — and this despite not being
part of the mayor’s all-powerful (according to some who are not on it)
Executive Committee.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/14515</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[city/city]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2008/01/07</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/14515</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Bigging up Del Grande]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[This week’s lead City story, &quot;The Rising Right,&quot; was the result of a number of interviews and pages and pages of
transcribed notes. Needless to say, I collected much more information
that I had room for, so over the next few days, I plan to follow up
with stories, quotes, thoughts and tidbits of information that I didn’t
have the space to include in the paper. Today, I’d like to offer some
points of clarification.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/14348</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[city/city]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2008/01/03</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/14348</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Toronto in the toilet?]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[Have you read Philip Preville’s cover story in <em>Toronto Life</em> — the one with the picture of city hall on the cover with a toilet bowl
in place of the clam shell and the headline “Where your money goes”?
Preville does a good job of revealing many of the things that could use
fixing at city hall. The planning department is one: “[The city’s]
planning department — more overworked and understaffed than any other —
cannot meet its obligations to review developers’ proposals, consult
stakeholders, conduct studies and make recommendations to council. The
situation amounts to a form of planning insolvency, and the city is
forever in the urbanist’s bankruptcy court know as the Ontario
Municipal Board.”
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/13384</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/19</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/13384</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: pedestrians get snowed out]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[Us Canadians love to talk about the weather, which means Sunday’s
massive snowfall was a boon for local media. Reporters from every
outlet were sent out to cover the storm. Stuck in Orillia Sunday night,
I watched the evening news, which showed car accidents, good Samaritans
helping push cars stuck on the side of the road, people digging their
cars out of snowbanks and other car-related problems suffered because
of the snow.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/13261</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/18</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/13261</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Supportive Housing Approval]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[It was heartening to see city council almost unanimously vote in favour of new supportive and <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-8831.pdf%20">transitional housing projects</a>
this morning, despite vocal opposition from NIMBY residents.
Councillors from across the political spectrum agreed that despite
fears over safety and property values expressed by some citizens,
creating homes for those who need extra care and help to get their
lives back in order was the right thing to do.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12938</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/13</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12938</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Capital budget breakdown]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[As usual, the size of the city’s debt makes the headlines, while what
our political representative are actually spending our money on does
not, reinforcing the notion that paying taxes is of little value.
“Toronto’s spiraling debt to hit $2.6 billion in 2008,&quot; screams the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/article/284778"><em>Toronto Star</em></a>. &quot;City to sink further into debt for new services,” proclaims <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20071212.COUNCIL12/TPStory/TPNational/Ontario/"><em>The Globe and Mail</em></a>. &quot;City budget may add 2% to tax bill,” says the <a href="http://www.nationalpost.com/todays_paper/story.html?id=162396"><em>National Post</em></a>.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12826</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/12</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12826</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Sports: The Great White Hype]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
On Saturday night, Floyd Mayweather, Jr., the sole remaining bankable
boxer that the fight game’s got to offer, faced beloved Briton Ricky
“The Hitman” Hatton in Las Vegas for the welterweight crown — and,
going into the fight, it was impossible to ignore the Hatton hype. But,
really, it could have been any Great White Hope from the past 40 years
that they were talking about.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12663</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/11</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12663</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Tuesday notes]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[During questions of staff and Mayor David Miller, Councillor Mike Del
Grande asked Miller whether the budget addressed the recent findings of
the <a href="http://www.fcpp.org/main/publication_detail.php?PubID=1954">Frontier Centre for Public Policy</a>,
which found that Toronto spent too much on “niceties,” or as Del Grande
described it “like-to-dos vs. have-to-dos.” Here’s how Miller responded:
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12713</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/11</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12713</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Cutting down on road salt]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
Though I can’t seem to find it online now, a week and a bit ago,&nbsp; <em>Metro</em>
reported that the City of Toronto would be using more road salt in
order to cut back on plowing costs. This concerned me even more than
CAA’s claims that the city’s new plowing practices would compromise
motorists’ safety. I wrote an article on the dangers of road salt in <a href="http://www.spacing.ca/"><em>Spacing</em></a>’s
winter/spring 2007 issue. Ever since then, whenever I come across piles
of the stuff generously spread on walkways and roads, I can’t help but
cringe, and not just because it leaves marks on my otherwise reasonably
fashionable green winter boots.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12635</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/10</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12635</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Bring in the armed forces]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.toronto.ca/councillors/mammoliti1.htm">Giorgio Mammoliti</a> is taking cues from former mayor Mel Lastman: when in doubt, call in the <a href="http://archives.cbc.ca/IDC-1-69-2013-12772-11/on_this_day/life_society/twt">army</a>. Frustrated with gangs and gunfire in his ward, the Etobicoke councillor, says it may be time to call in the <a href="http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20071206/councillor_wants_army_071206/20071206?hub=TopStories">troops</a>.
Though he admits the idea is a bit “out there,” the way he sees it,
&quot;the army can come in here and deal with things the way they feel they
need to be done and they got a whole new set of rules.&quot;
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12501</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/07</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12501</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Walkability, snow removal and the creative class]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
<a href="http://creativeclass.com/richard_florida/">Richard Florida</a>, the author and academic responsible for popularizing the rise and flight of the creative class among urban thinkers, says the <a href="http://www.brookings.edu/papers/2007/1128_walkableurbanism_leinberger.aspx">top 10 most walkable American cities</a> pale in comparison to Toronto’s walkability. 
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12142</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/05</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12142</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Rabbit costumes, espresso machines, trips to China — oh my!]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
It seems the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/282265">media</a> never tires of getting to the bottom of <a href="http://robford.ca/councilexpenses.asp">how much</a> councillors spend of the $53,100 they’re each allotted for office expenses — and, of course, what, exactly, they spend it on.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12051</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/04</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/12051</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: OMB reform now]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
“There seems to be a vicious downward spiral in planning since amalgamation,” North York Councillor <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/councillors/filion1.htm">John Fillion</a>
said during the Planning and Growth Management committee meeting Nov.
29. To get a better understanding of how the planning department has
been dealing with their workload as of late, the committee asked for a <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-8773.pdf">report</a> outlining how the department is run. &nbsp;
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11857</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/12/03</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11857</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: The blind fighting the blind]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
By now most people have likely heard the story of David Lepofsky, the
blind lawyer who took the TTC to task for failing to make The Better
Way accessible to the visually impaired. The most incredible thing
about this story is how the TTC fought Lepofsky every step of the way —
how it first spent $450,000 on private lawyers to oppose the
announcement of stops on subways, and then, even after having been
found to be in violation of human rights by Human Rights Tribunal of
Ontario, spent another $180,000 to fight Lepofsky in court yet again
when he then demanded that all stops also be called out on streetcars
and buses.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11805</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/30</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11805</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Architecture trumps hot dogs]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
Apparently hot dog carts and ice cream trucks don’t go with the ROM’s
swanky new redesign. After spending $270 million on architect Daniel
Libeskind’s Crystal, the <a href="http://www.rom.on.ca/index.php">ROM</a>
doesn’t want to obstruct its flashy new front entrance. Food venders
are being asked to move, but this, they argue, will cause their sales
will drop. Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone even accuses the museum of
attempting to put the vendors out of business.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11484</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/28</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11484</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: What Ford can afford]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
Yesterday’s Executive Committee meeting was a bad one to miss. It would
have been interesting to watch the look on Rob Ford’s face as his
colleagues discussed how to best reprimand the maverick, low-spending
councilor for claiming, apparently, nothing in office expenses. Ford is
mum on how he funds such expenses (his website is but one example that
he does have some), but most believe he pays for everything out of his
own deep pockets. Councillors have been wanting to get Ford on this for
a long time now and yesterday, they likely delighted in discussing
possibly withholding pay from the big fella — not that he really cares:
“If they suspend my pay for three months, they suspend my pay for three
months…What are they going to do next, throw me in jail?” said Ford to
the <em>Toronto Star</em>.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11234</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/27</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11234</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[City Hall: Eight things I learned last week]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[Downspouting, bike lines, pool permits, water bottles and city councillor in sexy-shower shocker!
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11102</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/26</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/11102</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Downspouting on the upswing]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
Suddenly, disconnecting <a href="http://www.eyeweekly.com/city/cityhall/article/9159">downspouts</a>
is all the rage. Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Chair Glenn
Debaeremaeker said this week that his office has gotten more calls
about the city’s Downspout Disconnection Program than it did about the
land transfer tax. Thousands of homeowners called in to get the free
service before it was <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/water/protecting_quality/downspout.htm">axed</a> this Tuesday.<br />]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/10882</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/23</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/10882</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Much ado about mulch]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[Here’s the <a href="http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/276682%20">problem</a>:
thanks to an exceptionally warm summer and fall with very little rain,
many trees still have their leaves. The sprawling mulberry in my back
yard hasn’t even changed colour yet. The city’s l<a href="http://www.toronto.ca/transportation/leaf_pickup/index.htm">eaf pickup program</a>,
however, is due to end in less than three weeks. If leaves haven’t
fallen by then, what are residents going to do after they rake them
from their lawns?
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/blogs/article/10100</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/blogs]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/17</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/blogs/article/10100</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[When animals fight back]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
In Toronto, raccoons and squirrels are par for the course, but as I
learned this summer, just because they’ve adapted to urban life doesn’t
mean they aren’t affected by the changes we make to our built
environment — the squirrels in Allan Gardens can attest to <a href="http://spacing.ca/wire/?p=2301">that</a>.
Here in T.O., city-living animals and us humans often clash over issues
such as bird poop (which blemishes our fine architecture and pollutes
beaches where we might like to swim) and green bins (designing those
suckers to be raccoon-proof has been a lot harder than first thought).
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/10075</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/15</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/10075</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[By the numbers: the kids of T.O.]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[
There are a lot of kids living in Toronto, and for many of the youngsters, life in the T Dot is good.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/9205</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/11/12</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/9205</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[TTC takeover may be tempting]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[The Toronto Star is in a tizzy over speculation that the province may want to upload responsibility of our beloved TTC to the <a href="http://www.gtta.com/en/home.htm">Greater Toronto Transportation Authority (GTTA). </a>Yesterday,<a href="http://416-777-7777.com/News/Ontario/article/269896"> it reported</a>
that the TTC was building a public relations campaign in the event that
the province tries to pull such a move, and Chair Adam Giambrone has
publicly stated that the TTC belongs to Toronto.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/7194</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[city/city]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[TTC]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/10/26</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/city/city/article/7194</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[One last stab at the cuts]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[Council spent a good part of the afternoon yesterday discussing the <a href="http://www.toronto.ca/finance/cost_containment.htm">cost containment measures.</a> Why rehash this old debate? 
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6855</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[Toronto Cost Containment]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/10/25</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6855</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[TPA changes its mind]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[The Toronto Parking Authority (TPA) reversed their decision to <a href="http://spacing.ca/wire/?p=2332">expropriate the Matador </a>at their meeting this evening
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6866</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[Toronto Parking Authority; TPA; Matador]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/10/25</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6866</guid>
                   </item>
             
                  <item>
                      <title><![CDATA[Never Ending Tax Talk]]></title>
                      <description><![CDATA[In the not so far off past, any suggestion of new taxes, any at all,
would be political suicide. Today, in light of all the discussion
surrounding the land transfer tax and the city’s financial problems,
ideas for new taxes (anything but the land transfer tax or property
taxes, really) are much more welcome.
]]></description>
                      <link>http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6862</link>
                      <category><![CDATA[blogs/cityhall]]></category>
                      <keywords><![CDATA[]]></keywords>
                      <pubDate>2007/10/25</pubDate>
                      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://eyeweekly.com/blogs/cityhall/article/6862</guid>
                   </item>
             
    </channel>
</rss>